By Joseph Wiedeman, Interning Correspondent for The Apopka Voice
In Summary:
Wednesday’s Apopka City Commission meeting grew contentious as Commissioner Nadia Anderson challenged administrative decisions and questioned the commission’s priorities. Mayor Nick Nesta defended his actions and sought clearer rules governing commissioners’ use of city facilities and resources for events. After Commissioner Jes Baron’s proposed event limits failed to receive a second, commissioners unanimously approved Anderson’s motion to suspend discretionary spending.
*****
A contentious discussion about administrative appointments and city priorities at Wednesday’s Apopka City Commission meeting ended with a unanimous vote to suspend commissioner discretionary spending.
Mayor Nick Nesta moved commissioner reports to just after public comment. During her report, Commissioner Nadia Anderson accused the commission of corruption, questioned recent personnel decisions and argued that infrastructure and the implications of Amendment 3 deserved more attention.
“I wanna go ahead and kinda change the tone a little bit,” Anderson said. “I grew up speaking out, my mother would look at me and be like dont say that when everyone is just sitting back like everything is ok. Guess what? I’m not okay today.”
Anderson said former interim City Administrator Radley Williams had been promised a permanent appointment the day before his dismissal. She also questioned the reason for his termination.
“When our former city administrator was fired and let go,” Anderson said. “After he was promised the day before that he would be made the permanent city administrator. This is someone who just had a baby, two little kids, and really without cause was let go.”
Anderson criticized the amount of meeting time devoted to discretionary spending, saying commissioners should focus on infrastructure and passing Amendment 3. She also compared recent personnel decisions to political appointments in Washington, D.C., before addressing the hiring of interim City Administrator Brian Mater.
“Nothing against Brian Mater; he could be a great guy,” Anderson said. “But one thing that I know is that when it comes to running a city and being a city administrator, there are a lot of qualified people.”
The discussion then turned to an event identified in a Monday email as a “Paving the Way Workshop.” Anderson questioned whether it was a town hall. After initially seeking clarification, Nesta said it was an internal training session for employees.
“That’s not a town hall,” Nesta said. “That's for employees to learn about signs and signals of sex trafficking and human trafficking so that while they’re out and about serving the residents, they can make sure they can see the signs of someone trafficked sexually. So yeah, I will be doing that.”
Anderson disputed that explanation, saying it did not match the email’s description. She accused Nesta of misusing a policy he had criticized under previous administrations. Nesta maintained that he had answered her question directly.
During his report, Nesta said the city had identified a permanent administrator and would announce the appointment in the coming weeks. He emphasized that Mater’s appointment was interim.
“People may not like it, and it may make you uncomfortable,” Nesta said. “When we actually do the will of the people and what we were elected to do, it's going to be incredible.”
Nesta also announced that four department leadership appointments would come before the commission for ratification Friday. They include IT Director Robert Hippler, whom Nesta said had served in the role for more than a decade without commission ratification, along with appointments for parks and recreation director, human resources director and chief financial officer.
Debate turns to discretionary spending
The commission continued through its scheduled business until it landed on discretionary spending.
“We do have a policy on discretionary funds,” Nesta said. “This is something the vice-mayor had asked many, many times in the past, which is, what can we spend discretionary funds on, so this was done last year.”
Nesta distinguished commissioners’ discretionary accounts from a separate provision allowing elected officials two free events. He said his goal was to clarify ambiguous language governing those events and establish boundaries for the use of city resources. He maintained that the proposed changes were intended to improve the policy rather than limit commissioners’ activities, then recognized Commissioner Yesenia Baron.
“My recommendation is to maintain the two permitted uses per elected official,” Baron said. “Establishing a max value of $5,000 for each event, including all city staffing. That excludes the use of the Apopka Amphitheater and Camp Wewa.”
Baron said her proposed limits should not be circumvented and that expenses should be documented in advance. Vice Mayor Diane Velazquez added that unused benefits should not carry over into the next fiscal year.
“I feel like any time if we are going to use a city facility and have use of the discretionary funds,” Velazquez said. “We should at least send an email with the intent to the interim city administrator.”
Velazquez suggested using a form to document requests. Nesta pointed to Sanford’s approach, describing a process in which requests are presented formally during commissioner reports.
Anderson then proposed suspending discretionary spending altogether.
“This is what I think we should do," Anderson said. “I don’t think we’re talking about enough Amendment 3. So I just move that with the discretionary fund we completely suspend it.”
As an alternative, Anderson suggested restricting the money to infrastructure and designating it an infrastructure fund. Public speakers who followed supported suspending discretionary spending.
Baron’s motion died for lack of a second. Anderson’s motion passed unanimously, suspending all commissioner discretionary spending.
Five key points
- Commissioner reports moved earlier in the meeting, setting up a heated exchange between Nesta and Anderson.
- Anderson criticized the dismissal of former interim City Administrator Radley Williams and questioned the appointment of Brian Mater.
- Nesta emphasized Mater’s interim status and said a permanent administrator had been identified.
- Baron proposed retaining two permitted events per elected official with a $5,000 cap per event, including city staffing, but her motion received no second.
- Anderson cited concerns about Amendment 3 and infrastructure needs before securing unanimous support to suspend commissioner discretionary spending.
