Report Inappropriate Comments

I have not read the original draft, or the disputed draft, the city returned to GES. I could have viewed them, but I didn't trust clicking on the links of those websites. I am certain they both would have been clear as mud to me, because so much of the fire operation talk is Greek to me, all those intial talk, for example: what is a SOG, etc. All I can say for certain is, there are two sides to each and every story......what surprises me in the above article is that GES got a purchase order to start the project, but there was no written contractual agreement, as GES claimed? It looks like a big bunch of red tape, but it is, what it is, and the city must move on, and move forward, as the city has other issues and departments to take care of, than be bogged down with this Gannon report of the fire department.