Report Inappropriate Comments

I think the issue is that teachers (in my personal experience going to both Catholic and Public schools) have at times tried to "confide" or be "friends" with students in an attempt to have a stronger relationship within the classroom. However, there have been times where the discussion of these topics was not relevant to subject discussion. The teacher just felt like being "relatable" and social. Sometimes, even project their disappointment in what they get paid and attribute politics to the educational agenda. In addition, subject material in textbooks was then "interpreted" by the teacher and "taught" within the classroom. Sure, as children we aren't always attentive not interested in every little thing our teachers may have said or taught but that doesn't negate the fact that it's going beyond what the lesson plan is meant to teach.

In the particular case of students seeking help navigating their identity, I think that the discussion needs to take place out of the classroom. The classroom is meant for educating students on approved subject material. Especially with younger children. Case in point, this very article discusses more of a concern from the teacher's lense. Projecting their ***ual identity within the classroom rather than focusing on the material. To be clear, I am not an objector to anyone's personal preferences. But preferences are personal and should be left outside of the classroom regardless of one's personal preference. This is a very touchy subject for many but it's important to evaluate the role of teaching this material responsibly and I agree that the law should be more clarified.