Log in
Apopka City Council

Developing Story: Public comments not part of the City Council livestream

At the instruction of the administration, video was turned off

Posted

The August 7th Apopka City Council meeting was another marathon, going well over the four-hour mark. And although the public comments session was discussed at different times during the meeting, it was not included in the live-streaming video on the City's YouTube channel, as it was moved to the end after the Mayor's Report and then not recorded.

The Apopka Voice texted all five members of the City Council to learn why public comments were not included in the video. According to two members of the Council, Apopka Mayor Bryan Nelson made the decision not to include them in the live stream.

"The mayor instructed staff to cut the feed to YouTube for public comment," said Commissioner Nick Nesta.

From his seat on the dais, Nesta recorded public comments and posted them on his Commissioner's Facebook page.

Commissioner Diane Velazquez backed up Nesta's assertion.

"At the mayor's direction, Live Feed was turned off," Velazquez said. "During the public comment session, the question about turning off Live Feed was directed to Robert Hippler from IT. He responded that it was the decision made by the Administration."

Commissioner Alexander Smith also confirmed the feed was cut but did not know why. 

"I think we all learned that it had been cut at the same time," he said. "I heard the question asked what happened, but there was so much commotion that I never heard the response."

Nelson acknowledged that the video was cut after the Mayor's Report but before the public comments. He did, however, offer an alternative to the live feed.

"Audio is still available," he said. "You’ll need to contact IT in the morning."

Commissioner Nadia Anderson did not respond to the text message before the publication of this article.

This is a developing story and will be updated in future editions of The Apopka Voice.

Apopka City Council, Apopka, Public Comments, Apopka City Hall, Why are the public comments positioned last in the meeting?

Comments

13 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • MamaMia

    Yes, the circus is in town. I think some of the public comments have been too over the top. I have softened wondered why the mayor didn't wear out his gavel or have the culprits escorted out the door. One note is, the cir

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MamaMia

    sorry, we hit the bumps in the roads, and I didn't get to finish posting. Anyway, one thing to note is, the city commissioners are partly to blame for the public show of disrespect because of Kyle Becker's censure of the mayor, and the other commissioners who voted for the censure, parroting Becker. You have reaped what you all have sown. Now don't act so holier than thou. My above posting meant often, not softened as it appeared. The computer put that in, and then whoops, we hit the bump in the road!

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MamaMia

    The Circle K at Welch Road and RSR, is now open. Today is the first day open for business. We got gas, and cigs for my husband. One employee told us the grand opening will be next Friday with a lot of vendors. He told me the mayor is invited, and the police chief, and the fire chief, but the mayor will not be in attendance, as he has some other business to attend, but will stop in before next Friday. Maybe it was a conference, he stated?

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MDuran

    You clearly seem to be in the pocket of the mayor, just as Commissioner Smith and Anderson is. You also seem to have an ax to grind with Becker. Appropriate action was taken because the mayor DID in fact lie to the public. That is a fact. Furthermore, the mayor also runs the meeting. Anyone getting out of hand can be warned and escorted out of city hall. The unanswered question is why do the same people show up, complain about the same thing over and over ? Is it because they are ignored?

    At any rate, or any position you take up on this, under no circumstance should the public be denied recorded public speaking. The mayor had this all planned out since last week. The public that votes our elected officials in office have the right to record of public speaking. Democracy is dead in Apopka. Development has taken over the residents of Apopka. You don’t matter. Only developers matters. How anyone can view what the mayor did as justified lacks the same dignity and character as him. His staff is working unethically and under the pressure of this mayor.

    Very disappointing for Apopka.

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MamaMia

    Mr. Duran, You are very wrong. I DO MATTER! Also, to another detestable person who referred to me as a nobody, I AM SOMEBODY in God's eyes. You people are nothing but two faced. Trying to be nice and then backstabbing, is your MO. Don't lecture me Michael Duran. I live here. Do you ever go and speak at Clermont City Hall? I doubt it......

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MDuran

    According to your mayor, you as a resident of Apopka is a NO BODY. Apopka residents do not matter to Apopkas mayor. Perhaps you missed my point. Furthermore, I don’t need to attend Clermont city hall. Our city is well managed and we have not lost a firefighter due to incompetence.

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MamaMia

    Mr Duran., The mayor did not say, I don't matter, you are the one who said I don't matter. Fact .

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • NadJams

    I think some residents are missing the point. Unless you make public comments that favor the current Mayor or what he agrees with, you will be denied the right to share your opinion during the live stream. Which would indicate that most, if not all of us don't matter to the current Mayor.

    If people are getting off course or out of hand, then the council can & should ask them to return to their seat & allow others to speak.

    No one should be silenced because the Mayor doesn't like what they have to say. And not allowing others who can't attend in person to hear everyone's voice is a disservice to all of us.

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MDuran

    Mia- you are missing the point completely. When said “you” don’t matter, The word “you” was used in a general term. The mayor sent a message yesterday in city hall that residents don’t matter. Had you been in that meeting and wished to be recorded on record speaking, you would not have gotten that. Just like every other resident that was not recorded on record. So when I said YOU don’t matter, it was directed at YOU as a person, rather YOU as a resident. I apologize for any miss understanding on my part. YOU as a resident of Apopka (not personally, as I don’t even know you) matters not to the mayor. Over 100 people wanted public comment in the front of the meeting. Your mayor got it to the very back of the meeting. Apopka residents want their public comments recorded into public record. The mayor cut the YouTube feed. He didn’t care what the residents wanted. He only cares about what the developers want. I don’t know how to explain this further. I was not referring to YOU personally, rather than YOU as a resident.

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MDuran

    Mia- *edit* “it was NOT directed to you as a person, rather YOU as a resident “

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MDuran

    NadJam- thank you for helping clarify what I was trying to convey.

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • EJepSn

    Some of you seem to be confused about "rights." A member of the public does not have a "right" to speak on matters which are not on an agenda. A local government can stop providing "public comment" altogether if it's commenting on a matter not on the agenda. Every member of the public has the right to comment on matters on the agenda. A member of the public does not have the right to have his comments "broadcast." Is the point of speaking at public comment to address the elected officials directly, or is it to increase the number of "clicks" on the commenter's social media? The right to address is not removed because the comments are not broadcast. If someone is upset that they are not having their comments broadcast, then it is because they care more about the "spectacle" and the notoriety than they do about their message to their officials. No one in the city is stopping anyone from broacasting their own messages using their own media. Nobody's right to speech is being removed.

    Thursday, August 8 Report this

  • MDuran

    it's generally illegal for a council member to silence a citizen during public speaking at a city hall meeting because it violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The First Amendment protects the public's ability to voice their opinions, including criticism of government officials. For example, in one case, the Urbana City Council was found to have violated the Open Meetings Act when it muted citizens who criticized the mayor and city employees during public comment.

    Thursday, August 8 Report this